Early Intervention Reducing Recidivism Among Children

Early Intervention reducing recidivism among children and immature offenders scholar number s2875363 Student name Kate ORe dizzyy Course name CCJ10 launching to Forensic Psychology Enrollment External, Griffith University Course convener Dr. Myesa Knox Mahoney Course tutor Domanic De Andrade achieverion due Wed 23rd Jan 2013 Word count 1430 It has been widely decl atomic number 18 that crime has consequences for separates and society (Ou & Reynolds, 2010).So it has been widely accepted that children and adolescents with anti mixer demeanour are a societal problem (Helmond, Overbeek & Brugman, 2012). Anti kindly behavior is characterised by raging offences such as robbery and assault causing harm to not only its victims only when to society as well (Helmond, Overbeek & Brugman, 2012). Society pays the worth for crime not only in loss of mortalal do and medical costs but also in the cost of immurement to the tax payers (Ou & Reynolds, 2010).It is the unsociable behaviour , that is targeted in early preventives, in an attempt to devolve delinquency (Hollin & Palmer, 2009). Studies have been undertaken that provide evidence that hinderance is effective and benefits the integral of society (Ou & Reynolds, 2010). In this essay, focus go out be drawn specifically to intervention and its part in curbing recidivism in youthful offenders.The impact of early intervention for little offenders will be explored in detail, and some examples of early interventions, how and why they work, will be examined and this research will support the success of early interventions and their effectiveness in fighting recidivism. In exploring the rationale of young offenders we uncover reasons why early intervention send away lessen the rate of recidivism and in some cases effectively quell re offending. Research has been conducted showing that the brains emersion does not stop before at least the early twenties (Buchen, 2012).This means that adolescents are far much likely to act before considering the consequences, they are impetuous, and easily influenced by their peers (Buchen, 2012). direct much than ever campaigners for youths are working towards less punishment and more importantly far more opportunity for intervention or rehabilitation (Buchen, 2012). Research into crime has shown that criminal activities occurring in gravidhood have been frame to follow a youths pass bestride of criminal use and antisocial behaviour, organic evolution into an adult re-offender, (Ou & Reynolds, 2010).Youth offenders show predictors early in living that include the sex, race and ethnicity of the juvenile, as well as aggression, and antisocial behaviour in childhood (Ou & Reynolds, 2010). They seat be coerced to offend simply be possess of stressors in their lives (Sealock & Manasse, 2012). In some cases studies have enabled prediction of delinquency that feces past allow prevention of youth involvement in the juvenile nicety system all tog ether, (Sealock & Manasse, 2012).Where this is not the case and a young person is incarcerated, early intervention is required to curb re-offenders. Mentally ill juveniles will offend three times as frequently as some other juveniles, and for these offenders imprisonment can be fruitless causing significant affix in symptoms instead of reversing environ psychical damage and improving their skills as it is in be (Erickson, 2012). This puts them further at risk are mentally ill juveniles, for whom demanding bearing events, such as loss of job or family breakdown, will frequently lead to violence as a response (Markowitz, 2011).For these mentally ill youths social opportunities can be limited, they will have troublesomey finding a job, stable accommodation and a support network (Markowitz, 2011). at that place often limited opportunities for intervention before the fact (Markowitz, 2011). Because of this some offenders tend towards homelessness and crimes of survival such as sh oplifting and trespassing, some committing these non-violent crimes as a way of seeking intervention they would not otherwise have regain to (Hinday, 1997).Symptoms of mental illness include impulsivity and impaired judgment and can cause already hotheaded youths to act in antisocial ship canal (Hinday, 1997). A form of intervention that continually arises in research looking at young offenders is the use of cognitive behavioural therapy or modification. cognitive behavioral therapy is founded on social learning, and adopts the theory that offenders have learned unsuitable ways of behaving due to their environment (McGuire, 2003).Many intervention plans include this type of intercession, sometimes joined with psychiatric treatments (Jones, Chancey, Lowe & Risler, 2010). Cognitive behavioural techniques encourage offenders to think through a situation, instead of ensuing their immediate response. A reaction that can often be impetuous and self-centered attitudes that increase the likelihood of anti-social behavior (McGuire, 2003). In cognitive behavioural therapy an offenders learning is conditioned, they are trained to eradicate maladjustive actions (McGuire, 2003).Cognitive, rehabilitation or intervention computer political coursemes aim to bring changes to youth offenders (Jones et al. , 2010). newborn adults, who spend time incarcerated, carry with them a laid-back likelihood of recidivism when they bring back from correctional facilities and attempt to transition back into society, ( mob, Stams, Asscher, De Roo &Van der Laan, 2013). Research has provided a variety of reasons as too why juveniles find it so difficult when re engaging with society, one important reason explained by James et al,. 2013) is that not only are they coming to terms with the challenges of relocation from a juvenile facility back into every day life but they are doing this while simultaneously coping with the move from adolescents into adult hood. Helmond et al. , (2012) Discusses an intervention programme constructed by cognitive-behavioural therapy called EQUIP, a program designed to communicate to young antisocial offenders who would be reintegrating into society, ways of acting and thinking responsibly. The EQUIP program is used in correctional facilities all over the world.EQUIP incorporates a arrogant peer culture in which parties want to support others due to developing feelings of responsibility for them. The main focus of EQUIP is to address mental misrepresentation, deficiencies, and social and moral skills (Helmond et al. , 2012). A private not-for-profit agency, Hillside in the US, is a provider of intervention services for mentally ill young people and their families or guardians (Jones et al. , 2010). This program includes community-based services and a residential treatment facility, which treats participants under a program called Interpersonal Skills Program (Jones et al. 2010). Treatment through this program includes structured f ramework, company therapy and individual therapy as well as family therapy (Jones et al. , 2010). Hillsides program kit and caboodle on cognitive behavioural treatment focusing on mental distortions, managing and assessing risk as well as avoiding situation leading to regress (Jones et al. , 2010). For those adolescents in the justice system who require treatment for subject matter abuse, this can be a form of early intervention as offenders can be sent to juvenile drug court (Nissen & Pearce, 2011).Substance abuse treatment programs in collaboration with the juvenile justice system provide this method acting of intervention where youths are educated and put through an intensive program of rehabilitation as opposed to incarceration (Nissen & Pearce, 2011). High recidivism amidst adolescents has encouraged the politics to provide funding from the government to develop and maintain re-integration as intervention, spare-time activity the lack of success using probation-only in th e attempt to prevent adolescents re-offending (Nissen & Pearce, 2011). James, et al. (2013), found that this type of program referred to as after care has had great success when starting a program during incarceration and when aimed at youths with a high risk of re-offending. Another successful after care program was genuine by the Robert Wood Johnson foundation and is called Reclaiming Futures (Nissen & Pearce, 2011). The program Reclaiming Futures deploys affirmative youth development and leadership building and efforts on leadership expansion in the community, a community that can offer assistance to bridge life in incarceration to life in society through constructive growth activities (Nissen & Pearce, 2011).Something that Reclaiming Futures does well is bring together suitable intervention and the needs of the adolescent offenders, and this provides an empathetic network around young people with the result being rarer occasions of violations when in parole (Nissen & Pearce, 2 011). Early interventions have been found to pull down the rate of recidivism when they target young offenders. As evidence suggests a career criminal is likely to begin offending as a child, not suddenly as an adult.Therefore intervention that targets change of behaviours, physically and mentally at an early age, prove effective. Intervention is successful at an early age because medically, an individuals brain does not stop developing until their ripe twenties. As a result, adolescents can react impulsively to situations, leading to antisocial and criminal behaviour then ultimately to prosecution. The chances of this situation arising are heightened in mentally ill youths however, by incorporating the various approaches of early intervention a program can be planned base on an individual needs assessment.This plan is determined by the offence committed, and requirements of the youth, and allows positive outcomes to be achieved. All research suggests that the affirmative results are the product of early interventions. References Buchen, L. (2012). erudition in court arrested development. Nature, 484(7394), 304-306. inside10. 1038/484304a Erickson, C. D. (2012). Using Systems of Care to Reduce internment of Youth with Serious Mental Illness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49(3-4), 404416. inside 10. 1007/s10464-011-9484-4 Gibbs, J. C. , Potter, G.B. , Barriga, A. Q. & Liau, A. K. (1996). Developing the helping skills and prosocial motivation of aggressive adolescents in peer conference programs. Aggression and fierce Behavior, 1(3), 283-305. inside10. 1016/1359-1789(95)00018-6 Helmond, P. , Overbeek, G. & Brugman, D. (2012). Program integrity and effectiveness of a cognitive behavioral intervention for incarcerated youth on cognitive distortions, social skills, and moral development. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(9),17201728. DOI10. 1016/j. childyouth. 2012. 05. 001 Hiday,V. A. 1997). Understanding the connection amidst mental illnes s and violence. International journal of law and psychiatry, 20(4), 399-417. DOI10. 1016/S0160-2527(97)00028-9 Hollin, C. R. & Palmer, E. J. (2009). Cognitive skills programmes for offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(2-3), 147-164. DOIhttp//dx. doi. org/10. 1080/10683160802190871 James, C. , Stams, G. J. J. M. , Asscher, J. J. , De Roo, A. K. & Van Der Laan, P. H. (2013). Aftercare programs for reducing recidivism among juvenile and young adult offenders A meta-analytic review.Clinical Psychology Review, 33(2), 63274. DOI10. 1016/j. cpr. 2012. 10. 013 Jones, C. D. , Chancey, R. , Lowe, A. & Risler, E. A. (2010). Residential Treatment for sexually Abusive Youth An Assessment of Treatment Outcomes. Research on hearty Work Practice. 20(2), 172-182. DOIhttp//dx. doi. org/10. 1177/1049731509333349 Markowitz, F. E. (2011). Mental illness, crime, and violence Risk, context, and social control. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 16(1), 3644. DOI10. 1016/j. avb. 2010. 10. 003 McGuire, J. ( 2003).OffenderRehabilitationandTreatmentEffective Programmes and Policies to Reduce Re-offending. Retrieved from http//www. swin. eblib. com. au. ezproxy. lib. swin. edu. au/patron/FullRecord. aspx? p=146239&echo=1&userid=znHAXBQDThLw9bSY1Xo67Q%3d%3d&tstamp=1358851968&id=4B65141F70B1486C0EA05198C182C8FA6D56A7DB Nissen, L. B. & Pearce, J. (2011). Exploring the instruction execution of justice-based alcohol and drug intervention strategies with juvenile offenders Reclaiming Futures, enhanced adolescent substance abuse treatment, and juvenile drug courts.Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 6065. DOI10. 1016/j. childyouth. 2011. 06. 014 Ou, S. ,& Reynolds, A. J. (2010). Childhood predictors of young adult male crime. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(8), 10971107. DOI10. 1016/j. childyouth. 2010. 02. 009 Sealock, M. D. & Manasse, M. (2012). An uneven playing field The impact of strain and coping skills on treatment outcomes for juvenile offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(3), 238248. DOI10. 1016/j. jcrimjus. 2012. 02. 002