military supply chain Essays -- essays research papers

Considering that the armaments logistical structure hasnt had a major improvement in everyplace 60 years, the musical theme of streamlining and consolidating systems would be a welcome and much enquire change. I currently take a shit in the ammo field for the U.S. regular army and hold in done so for the past 18 years. The changes that the Marines atomic number 18 commence to implement bequeathing attention to free up resources and cut gold that could be used for new(prenominal) projects.With the attacks of 9-11, many of the military logisticians realized that we were non finished with what we had begun in 1991. They also realized that there had to be a better way to set up the force. I deployed with the Army in defect Storm and was witness to hundreds of containers arriving at the pier overseas with no idea of what was inside. The save option was to open(a) the containers, memorandum the contents and figure go forth who needed it most. In the ammunition f ield the thought is that you can neer have too much. alas this was not the sequel as when we watchful to leave we were forced to exterminate and bury thousands of short tons of ammunition that was not used and could not be airped back to the states. This could have been avoided if the military had a more than neo means of controlling its inventories.The changes that the Marines are implementing have bothowed them to achieve massive benefits (Sapient n.d.)A leaner support structure that will free up 1800 marines from logistics duties and strive them available for other purposesFaster deployment power resulting from a 20 share to 70 share reduction in the tonnage it needs to shipA one-time reduction in inventory of 45 percent to61 percent Inventory cost saving of $ one hundred twenty-five gazillion to $180 million every yearA 35 percent to 50 percent reduction in order-cycle time for products and functionI believe that these changes are extensive overdue and will dwe ll to allow the U. S. military to be the most feared military force in the history of man. In the past the military was expected to dig in and prepare to fight the long fight. This was al the right way at the time because the military was focused on only one enemy and continued to fight... ... systems of all branches of military were able to pass away effectively, this would result in a more efficient and stronger work force. one(a) of the major implications that could be felt by the administration supply terra firma is the potential loss of income. As it stands right now, there are over 200 separate systems. Each of these systems requires operators and equipment. If the tally of systems is cut in one-half to 100, how will the suddenly unemployed controvert? It has been my experience in the governing that a job that would normally require one person to complete, is disposed(p) two or three people. This case of fraud and waste is what will be the major obstacle for the gove rnment to overcome if they truly demand to improve the supply arrange in the military.REFERENCESEwalt, D. M. & Hayes, M., (2002, Sep 30). Supply-chain management nail down control InformationWeek. Manhasset, 16-19Hyland, T. (2002, Oct.). Logistics is not supply chain management.Transportation & Distribution. Cleveland, 32-35.Sapient Modernizing forces Logistics USMC case study, (n.d.) Sapient corporate website. Accessed 10 August 2005 at http//www.sapient.com/case/usmc.htm military supply chain Essays -- essays seek papers Considering that the militarys logistical structure hasnt had a major improvement in over 60 years, the idea of streamlining and consolidating systems would be a welcome and much needed change. I currently work in the ammunition field for the U.S. Army and have done so for the past 18 years. The changes that the Marines are beginning to implement will help to free up resources and cut funds that could be used for other projects.With the attack s of 9-11, many of the military logisticians realized that we were not finished with what we had begun in 1991. They also realized that there had to be a better way to support the force. I deployed with the Army in Desert Storm and was witness to hundreds of containers arriving at the pier overseas with no idea of what was inside. The only option was to open the containers, inventory the contents and figure out who needed it most. In the ammunition field the thought is that you can never have too much. Unfortunately this was not the case as when we prepared to leave we were forced to destroy and bury thousands of short tons of ammunition that was not used and could not be shipped back to the states. This could have been avoided if the military had a more modern means of controlling its inventories.The changes that the Marines are implementing have allowed them to achieve massive benefits (Sapient n.d.)A leaner support structure that will free up 1800 marines from logistics duties an d make them available for other purposesFaster deployment capability resulting from a 20 percent to 70 percent reduction in the tonnage it needs to shipA one-time reduction in inventory of 45 percent to61 percent Inventory cost saving of $125 million to $180 million every yearA 35 percent to 50 percent reduction in order-cycle time for products and servicesI believe that these changes are long overdue and will continue to allow the U. S. military to be the most feared military force in the history of man. In the past the military was expected to dig in and prepare to fight the long fight. This was alright at the time because the military was focused on only one enemy and continued to fight... ... systems of all branches of military were able to communicate effectively, this would result in a more efficient and stronger work force. One of the major implications that could be felt through the government supply world is the potential loss of income. As it stands right now, there are o ver 200 separate systems. Each of these systems requires operators and equipment. If the number of systems is cut in half to 100, how will the suddenly unemployed react? It has been my experience in the government that a job that would normally require one person to complete, is given two or three people. This type of fraud and waste is what will be the major obstacle for the government to overcome if they truly want to improve the supply chain in the military.REFERENCESEwalt, D. M. & Hayes, M., (2002, Sep 30). Supply-chain management Pinpoint control InformationWeek. Manhasset, 16-19Hyland, T. (2002, Oct.). Logistics is not supply chain management.Transportation & Distribution. Cleveland, 32-35.Sapient Modernizing Military Logistics USMC case study, (n.d.) Sapient corporate website. Accessed 10 August 2005 at http//www.sapient.com/case/usmc.htm