A Critique of Linda Prine’s “Abortion is not a bad thing”

In her article stillbirth is non a bad write out, published on June 24, 2013, the family medicine practitioner and the founder of the Reproductive wellness Access Project medical director Dr. Linda Prinehighly defend and stick to the uncover that miscarriage itself as an do it can be positive nevertheless our culture fails to praise the women rights in taking life-term decision and demonizes women instead for having an stillbirth. She in like manner shed the light on the importance of supporting the women on abortion to destigmatize the associated shame.Prine sees that it is quite enough to struggle for education and sprain, and here comes abortion to flurry having childrenuntil better ambience for rising children is ensured. Hearing and feeling that the tough jobs they do in the societies as expertized women atomic number 18 highly recognized, appreciated and respected is to a greater extent than quested. The articles generator begins her article with disconcertion b y the allegation that women getting abortionsare being to an extent distressed.It is the responsibility of our culture that ruin the go for of women for obtaining an abortion while the abortion familiarity itself can be affirmative. The main designate is to enlarge the right to lose abortions while decreasing the dishonor associated with it, so that the society as whole will recognize it as truly mutual and an ordinary part of life. Assertion from physicians, supporting women and their decisions, aims a big way towards removing the shame of abortion.Women are well-nigh encouraged to bring a close person to support them and then to praise that person, for the way in which he strengthens her and their relationship. While activists for abortion rights pretend that lessening the abortions number is mostly important. Prine disagrees and argues that unwanted births is the calamity, it should be step-downd. A woman can be a super mother only when she is ready and enough prepared f or it, in other words later she had pursued for substantially education and work.Thats wherefore it was good to postpone children and here appears why abortion is not a bad thing. A wise usage of social supply gives respect to all women, as well as their decisions, supportive relationships and experience which results in surpassing most of the social obstacles that blocks social development. In the article, the cause Linda Prine wants to convince us, using her life and go experience as a woman and as a family medicine practitioner. She had succeeded to an extent in doing her aim.She was utterly credible in trying to persuade us that abortion is sincerely not a bad thing bytaking advantages of the readers emotions using a animal(prenominal) languageby giving several life examples she used to experience in her career that made her certain that abortion is not that bad as the 16-year-old duette who came scared to her clinic, and how they relaxed a bit after she talked to them when they realized that she is helping them as well as the two mother/daughter pairs who realized after her visit how great their jobs when they are supporting their daughters goals in getting more education.The audience definitely empathizes with the womens psychological state and the fear she feels beforehand abortion and that after, this is the emotional appeal, it is an appeal to pathos. Being the founder of the Reproductive health Access Project medical director and a writer, people feels that the bang is more granted as an idea to adopt, and this is was another reason why she was credible. Here appealing to ethos is absolutely achieved as this is a clear whiz into the writers character and his respect to the reader.She insists that our societies are responsible for damage the womans image for having an abortion which can be almost positive, while they should be supportive and respective for the women and their decisions, supportive relationships and experience. The logic al abstract thought she followed is well detailed and with no hard terminology it could be followed easily. She emphasizes the emergency to decrease the shame associated with abortion so that it becomes something normal and undebatable. She suggests and encourages as a doctor the support of women having abortion especially from the closely people.She also sees abortion as positive in postponing children till better life situations are achieved. Logical fallacies were evaded which is excellent. To make it simple, she makes the reader well understand the importance and how honest the issue is especially when she related the positive effects of abortion to the women piece especially and to the society as a whole. She is absolutely a good persuader. One cannot deny that Prine was so logical in the way she presented her issue and supported it.Not only she let the issue enter into the readers heart, but she made that heart think how tender she is to be come to with the promotion of t he women rights by this way. She was biased in developing her argument as she neglected to state any counterargument. She even disagreed with the activists of abortion rights that they need to decrease the number of abortions. She insists instead that abortion is very normal. Outlining few opposing views would have made her argument better, no counter arguments were present.As a family doctor and writer at the same time, her role should notbe limited only to ease the abortion for females, her duty must extend to awake young couples before committing the steal of unwanted pregnancy. In her argument she only stuck to the necessity of social word sense of women having abortions but she didnt mention any moral, religious and conscious overview. Abortion is against God, it is denied by all religions. Abortion is also related to the basic kind-hearted values, so women should be less egoistic and more humanitarian regarding those unborn babies.Abortion is not safe, she shouldnt have mut ed this issue as a family doctor as she should know that abortion industry is not modulate and it can be accompanied with a mother death. She should have utter medical and social wise that it is a better alternative than having a defective fetus or child. All of those were not mentioned. Prines work presented abortion as a solid basis towhistle blow the need of the women rights in the society and the importance of respecting them. An underestimation of the effects of mentioning the counterarguments decreased her creativity. Although the way she presents her claim is so logical.